XAU / USD PROVIDER QUOTE

“Understand the forces behind gold.
Let discipline guide every decision.”

Gabriel Nicolaev - CyGuru
Gabriel Nicolaev - CyGuru
GLOBAL EDITION / ENGLISHGold market intelligenceIndependent intelligence by Gabriel Nicolaev – CyGuru
Explore CYGURU GOLD Menu +
Research Lab / Selected production evidence

12 NOVEMBER 2026 · 66 HAZEM SIGNAL · 5M SELL · TREND

The Gold TP3 Alert and the Candle Arrived 1.962 Seconds Apart

The five-minute Hazem TREND SELL reported its third target just after the 12:33 UTC minute closed. The alert reached the site first. The candle covering the touch arrived 1.962 seconds later, leaving two different clocks to reconcile.

A brushed gold disc passes close to a fixed navy wall with a gold edge.
Conceptual editorial illustration.

Open CyGuru Gold Terminal to inspect signal plans and lifecycle events →

The production evidence

This selected favorable example is an indicator-reported reference observation. The production gateway retained a separate activation report and an actual TP3_HIT with the same signal identity. Engine 66-HAZEM-V1, payload schema 1, OANDA:XAUUSD, 5-minute timeframe, SELL and TREND were recorded. A separate script build hash was unavailable.

Signal ID 66-HAZEM-V1|OANDA:XAUUSD|5|1794483300000
TP3 event ID 66-HAZEM-V1|OANDA:XAUUSD|5|1794483300000|1794486840175|TARGET
Production feed observed through .

All 5 production messages retained the same original Entry, SL and three targets, along with the same creation and expiry timestamps and setup fields. The event trail contains no earlier stop or invalidation for this identity. The receiver timestamps below come from the matching stored rows.

Original SELL levels and reference distances in USD per troy ounce
FieldLevelDistanceOriginal risk multiple
Entry3946.977——
Original SL3949.7642.787 adverse1.000R
TP13943.7673.210 favorable1.152R
TP23941.1405.837 favorable2.094R
TP33937.6399.338 favorable3.351R

One reference R is the absolute distance from the original entry to the original stop. Each target multiple divides the distance from entry by that fixed denominator. The ratios describe the proposal’s price levels. Broker fills, commissions, spread, slippage and P&L are unverified.

Source and receiver times, UTC
Recorded stageSource timeReceiver time
SIGNAL_CREATED
SIGNAL_UPDATED · activation
TP1_HIT
TP2_HIT
TP3_HIT

Replay of the site’s retained one-minute ranges

The signal-specific collector audit returned 56 OANDA:XAUUSD one-minute bars. The audited window has no missing minute slots. For a SELL, a low at or below a target counts as a nominal touch and a high at or above the original stop counts as a nominal stop. An earlier stop contradicts target-first ordering. A bar touching both requires finer verified observations to resolve the order. The window runs from the activation minute through the TP3 report minute. The activation minute is partial relative to the event clock and contains neither the stop nor TP1.

The maximum retained high in that window is 3949.145, below the original stop. No stop-before-target or same-bar stop/target conflict appears in these ranges. The site’s collector and the indicator both rely on TradingView inputs. An independently authenticated matching OHLC series was unavailable, so the replay remains a diagnostic on the collector data.

First collector minutes containing each target threshold
ThresholdMinute open, UTCHighLow
TP111:543944.7703943.080
TP212:283942.4903940.675
TP312:333939.0853937.350

The bar had closed before either record arrived

The first collector range to reach the original TP3 of 3,937.639 was the 12:33 UTC bar. Its low was 3,937.350 and it closed at 12:34:00.000. The indicator timestamped TP3 at 12:34:00.175, and the gateway stored the alert at 12:34:00.624. The collector row was received at 12:34:02.586, 1.962 seconds after the alert receipt.

Receipt order describes delivery to the site. The candle covers the minute ending at 12:34, so its later receipt does not place the underlying price touch after the alert. The recorded range also cannot resolve the exact instant of the touch. This difference matters when reviewing a live terminal and a historical candle audit side by side.

The closest approach to the stop came before TP1

The indicator reported activation at 11:39:00.174. At 11:49 the collector recorded its highest high in the audited window, 3,949.145, leaving 0.619 per troy ounce to the original stop at 3,949.764. The first TP1 threshold touch came in the 11:54 bar. The indicator reported TP1 at 11:55:00.282, TP2 at 12:29:00.176 and TP3 at 12:34:00.175.

The original stop distance was 2.787 from entry and the third target lay 9.338 below it, about 3.351 times the reference risk. The original levels stayed constant through all five messages, which makes the earlier adverse move and later target distances comparable. Those distances measure the setup geometry in USD per troy ounce.

Two TREND sells with different stops

A second five-minute Hazem TREND SELL appeared at 11:55 with a stop at 3,948.508. Its activation was recorded on the source clock at 12:02:00.176 and its own stop report at 12:20:00.374. The first plan used a higher stop at 3,949.764. The later stop event belongs to the later signal ID.

Gold Terminal shows the original levels alongside each lifecycle. Use the full identity to match a target or stop to the correct plan, then check the source and receiver times before interpreting the order of two messages. Two 15-minute PULLBACK sells created at noon and another still-open earlier PULLBACK also shared some of this price window. The snapshot preserves those records as context.

The snapshot preserves 4 other records with overlapping reported active windows on the same symbol. The selection and shared price exposure preclude an overall win rate, a claim of independence or an inference about future profits.

Download the dated JSON evidence and replay inputs →

Use Gold Terminal to compare the original plans, setup identities and reported outcomes →

66 Hazem Signal dossier · Research methodology · Gold trading journal guide · Gold Intelligence · Follow Research Lab

WRITTEN BYGabriel Nicolaev — CyGuru